TRISS Score (Trauma and Injury Severity Score): Predicting Survival in Trauma Patients
- Mayta
- 1 day ago
- 3 min read
Introduction
In trauma medicine, accurately predicting patient outcomes is essential for clinical decision-making, quality assurance, and research. While anatomical scores such as AIS and ISS describe injury severity, they do not account for the patient’s physiological condition at presentation.
To address this limitation, the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) was developed. TRISS integrates anatomical injury severity, physiological status, age, and mechanism of injury to estimate a trauma patient’s probability of survival (Ps).
What Is TRISS?
The TRISS score is a validated statistical model that predicts the probability of survival in trauma patients by combining:
Injury Severity Score (ISS) → anatomical injury burden
Revised Trauma Score (RTS) → physiological derangement
Age category
Mechanism of injury (blunt vs. penetrating)
📌 Key Concept: TRISS does not give a severity score like ISS — it gives a probability of survival (Ps) between 0 and 1 (or 0–100%).
Key Components of TRISS
1. Injury Severity Score (ISS)
Reflects anatomical injury severity
Calculated from AIS as:
Higher ISS → lower probability of survival
2. Revised Trauma Score (RTS)
RTS is a physiological score based on three vital clinical parameters:
Parameter | Component |
Neurological status | Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) |
Circulatory status | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) |
Respiratory status | Respiratory Rate (RR) |
Each variable is coded (0–4), then weighted:
📌 Exam Pearl: RTS ranges from 0 (worst) to 7.8408 (normal physiology).
Higher RTS = better physiological condition.
3. Age Factor
Age is treated as a binary variable in classic TRISS:
Age Group | Code |
< 55 years | 0 |
≥ 55 years | 1 |
Older age is associated with worse outcomes, even with similar injuries.
4. Mechanism of Injury
TRISS uses different coefficients depending on injury mechanism:
Blunt trauma (e.g., MVC, falls)
Penetrating trauma (e.g., stab wounds, gunshot wounds)
📌 This reflects differences in injury patterns and survival rates between mechanisms.
How TRISS Works (Conceptual Overview)
TRISS uses logistic regression to calculate survival probability.
Core Formula
Where:
b₀–b₃ are regression coefficients
Coefficients differ for blunt vs. penetrating trauma
📌 You are NOT expected to memorize coefficients for exams — but you must understand how variables influence survival.
Interpretation of TRISS Probability of Survival (Ps)
Ps Value | Interpretation |
> 0.90 | Very high survival probability |
0.50–0.90 | Moderate survival probability |
< 0.50 | High mortality risk |
< 0.25 | Very poor prognosis |
Clinical Meaning of Each Variable
Variable | Effect on Survival |
↑ ISS | ↓ Survival |
↑ RTS | ↑ Survival |
Age ≥ 55 | ↓ Survival |
Penetrating trauma | Variable (often better than blunt at same ISS) |
Purpose and Clinical Usage of TRISS
1. Trauma Care Benchmarking
Used in trauma registries
Compares observed vs. expected survival
Identifies system-level performance issues
📌 Example:If observed survival is worse than TRISS-predicted survival → possible quality-of-care problem
2. Prognostication
Provides an objective survival estimate
Supports communication within trauma teams
Used in research, not to withhold care
⚠️ Important:TRISS should never be used alone to decide treatment limitation.
3. Trauma Research
Standardized outcome measurement
Enables comparison between hospitals, regions, and time periods
Used in studies on injury prevention and trauma systems
Strengths of TRISS
✅ Combines anatomy + physiology
✅ Validated in large trauma populations
✅ Useful for system-level evaluation
✅ More predictive than ISS alone
Limitations of TRISS (High-Yield for Exams)
❌ Less accurate in:
Severe traumatic brain injury
Pediatric patients
Elderly populations
Non-Western trauma populations
❌ Uses:
Simplified age categories
Limited physiologic variables
Outdated coefficients in some settings
📌 These limitations led to the development of:
TRISS revisions
New trauma prediction models
Updated and Modified TRISS Models
Researchers have proposed improvements that include:
Continuous age variables
Improved handling of missing data
Better weighting for head injuries
Population-specific coefficients
Examples:
Revised TRISS
ASCOT
TMPM (Trauma Mortality Prediction Model)
TRISS vs ISS vs RTS (Quick Comparison)
Feature | ISS | RTS | TRISS |
Type | Anatomical | Physiological | Combined |
Predicts survival | Indirect | Limited | Yes |
Used for triage | No | Yes | No |
Used for benchmarking | No | No | Yes |
High-Yield
✅ TRISS predicts probability of survival, not injury severity
✅ Combines ISS + RTS + age + mechanism
✅ Uses different equations for blunt vs penetrating trauma
✅ Best used for quality assessment and research, not bedside decisions
✅ Limited accuracy in severe head injury
Summary
The TRISS score is a cornerstone tool in trauma epidemiology and quality assessment. By integrating anatomical injury severity (ISS) with physiological status (RTS) and patient factors, TRISS provides a quantitative estimate of survival probability. While invaluable for benchmarking and research, clinicians must understand its limitations and avoid using it as the sole determinant of patient care.