top of page

P-Values in Regression: Beyond Thresholds—A Clinical-Grade Guide

1. What is a p-value in Regression, Really?

A p-value tests how surprising your observed association (e.g., between age and systolic BP) would be if no true effect existed (null hypothesis: β = 0). The smaller the p, the less likely your data are under the null.

Stata in Action: regress systolicBP age bmi Here, p-values are attached to each coefficient. For age:β = 0.78, SE = 0.25, t = 3.12, p = 0.002. Strong evidence that age affects BP—unlikely random.

2. Why p-Values? The Clinical Logic

In clinical regression, p-values quantify uncertainty. They don’t prove clinical importance—they test statistical surprise:

  • p < 0.05: Unlikely due to chance → statistical significance.

  • p > 0.05: Could be random; does not prove absence of effect.

But:

  • Strength of association: Use the coefficient (β).

  • Precision: Check the confidence interval (CI).

  • Chance vs. signal: Use the p-value.

Reporting rule: Always show effect size and CI; p-value is only part of the story.

3. Deep Dive: What Else Shapes a p-Value?

  • Sample size (n): Larger n → smaller SE → often smaller p-values (even for minor effects).

  • Variability: More noise = less power = higher p-values.

  • Model complexity: Overfitting can create misleadingly “significant” p-values.

Real-World Example:

A massive cohort study may yield p < 0.0001 for a β of 0.01.Clinically trivial, statistically “significant.”

Lesson: Always report effect size and CI. Never “chase” low p-values.

4. Practical Workflow for Clinical Researchers

Step 1. Check Model Fit First

  • Explore data:

    summarize systolicBP age bmi, detailed histogram systolicBP

  • Fit regression:

    regress systolicBP age bmi

  • Examine:

    • Coefficient (β)

    • CI

    • p-value

Step 2. Interpret p-Value with Context

  • p < 0.05? Is β clinically meaningful? Is CI narrow?

  • p > 0.05? Is the sample too small? Is the effect real but underpowered?

Step 3. Don’t Ignore Assumptions

  • Linearity, residuals, independence, no major outliers.

Step 4. Report for Clinical Readers

“Age was associated with an average 0.78 mmHg increase in SBP per year (95% CI: 0.29 to 1.27; p = 0.002).”

5. Pitfalls & Misconceptions to Avoid

  • P-value ≠ probability effect is real. It’s “probability of the data if no effect.”

  • Statistical ≠ clinical significance. Tiny p with trivial β is often irrelevant for practice.

  • Non-significant ≠ no effect. May simply reflect low power.

  • Multiple testing. Many regressions = false positives. Adjust (Bonferroni, FDR) as needed.

6. When to Ignore p-Values: Modern Best Practices

  • Focus on effect sizes, CIs, prediction accuracy, and model diagnostics in reporting.

  • For prediction models (not just inference), calibration and discrimination (e.g., ROC/AUC) are often more valuable.

  • Use p-values for variable selection sparingly. Let clinical logic and DAGs drive confounder inclusion.

7. Clinical Grade Summary

P-values reflect how surprising your results are if there’s no true effect. They support—but never alone determine—clinical conclusions. Use p-values to quantify uncertainty, but always anchor interpretation in effect size, confidence intervals, and model validity.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post

​Message for International and Thai Readers Understanding My Medical Context in Thailand

Message for International and Thai Readers Understanding My Broader Content Beyond Medicine

bottom of page