P-Values in Regression: Beyond Thresholds—A Clinical-Grade Guide
- Mayta 
- Aug 7
- 2 min read
1. What is a p-value in Regression, Really?
A p-value tests how surprising your observed association (e.g., between age and systolic BP) would be if no true effect existed (null hypothesis: β = 0). The smaller the p, the less likely your data are under the null.
Stata in Action: regress systolicBP age bmi Here, p-values are attached to each coefficient. For age:β = 0.78, SE = 0.25, t = 3.12, p = 0.002. 
Strong evidence that age affects BP—unlikely random.
2. Why p-Values? The Clinical Logic
In clinical regression, p-values quantify uncertainty. They don’t prove clinical importance—they test statistical surprise:
- p < 0.05: Unlikely due to chance → statistical significance. 
- p > 0.05: Could be random; does not prove absence of effect. 
But:
- Strength of association: Use the coefficient (β). 
- Precision: Check the confidence interval (CI). 
- Chance vs. signal: Use the p-value. 
Reporting rule: Always show effect size and CI; p-value is only part of the story.
3. Deep Dive: What Else Shapes a p-Value?
- Sample size (n): Larger n → smaller SE → often smaller p-values (even for minor effects). 
- Variability: More noise = less power = higher p-values. 
- Model complexity: Overfitting can create misleadingly “significant” p-values. 
Real-World Example:
A massive cohort study may yield p < 0.0001 for a β of 0.01.Clinically trivial, statistically “significant.”
Lesson: Always report effect size and CI. Never “chase” low p-values.
4. Practical Workflow for Clinical Researchers
Step 1. Check Model Fit First
- Explore data: - summarize systolicBP age bmi, detailed histogram systolicBP 
- Fit regression: - regress systolicBP age bmi 
- Examine: - Coefficient (β) 
- CI 
- p-value 
 
Step 2. Interpret p-Value with Context
- p < 0.05? Is β clinically meaningful? Is CI narrow? 
- p > 0.05? Is the sample too small? Is the effect real but underpowered? 
Step 3. Don’t Ignore Assumptions
- Linearity, residuals, independence, no major outliers. 
Step 4. Report for Clinical Readers
“Age was associated with an average 0.78 mmHg increase in SBP per year (95% CI: 0.29 to 1.27; p = 0.002).”
5. Pitfalls & Misconceptions to Avoid
- P-value ≠ probability effect is real. It’s “probability of the data if no effect.” 
- Statistical ≠ clinical significance. Tiny p with trivial β is often irrelevant for practice. 
- Non-significant ≠ no effect. May simply reflect low power. 
- Multiple testing. Many regressions = false positives. Adjust (Bonferroni, FDR) as needed. 
6. When to Ignore p-Values: Modern Best Practices
- Focus on effect sizes, CIs, prediction accuracy, and model diagnostics in reporting. 
- For prediction models (not just inference), calibration and discrimination (e.g., ROC/AUC) are often more valuable. 
- Use p-values for variable selection sparingly. Let clinical logic and DAGs drive confounder inclusion. 
7. Clinical Grade Summary
P-values reflect how surprising your results are if there’s no true effect. They support—but never alone determine—clinical conclusions. Use p-values to quantify uncertainty, but always anchor interpretation in effect size, confidence intervals, and model validity.






Comments