How to Choose the Right Statistical Test: The “N-I-T” Framework for Clinical Epidemiologists

Navigating the world of statistical tests doesn't need to be overwhelming. The “N-I-T” method simplifies everything:

🧩 Step 1: Use the “N-I-T” Checklist

Core Question	Options
N – Number of groups/occasions?	Exactly 2 / More than 2
I – Independence?	Independent / Dependent
T – Type of outcome?	Numeric / Categorical

Answer these 3, and your test choice becomes nearly automatic.

---

📊 2. For Numeric Outcomes

Start by inspecting your outcome’s distribution.

• Symmetric with no extreme outliers → try parametric

• Skewed, ordinal, or small samples → favor non-parametric

✅ Exactly Two Groups

Structure	Parametric	Non-parametric
Independent groups	Independent-samples t-test	Mann-Whitney U (Wilcoxon rank-sum)
Two dependent means	Paired-samples t-test	Wilcoxon signed-rank test

🔍 Secret Insight: "Two dependent means" = measurements from the same subject or matched unit, pre/post or under two conditions.

✅ More Than Two Groups

Structure	Parametric	Non-parametric
Independent groups	One-way ANOVA	Kruskal-Wallis test
> Two dependent means	Repeated-measures ANOVA or linear mixed models	Friedman test

---

📋 3. For Categorical Outcomes

✅ Exactly Two Groups

Structure	Large Sample	Small Sample
Independent	Chi-square (χ²) test	Fisher’s exact test
Two dependent proportions	McNemar’s Chi-square test	Exact McNemar test

✅ More Than Two Independent Groups

Structure	Large Sample	Small Sample
r × k contingency table	Chi-square (χ²) test	Fisher–Freeman–Halton / Exact multinomial test

---

🧠 Final Reminders for Clinical Research

• Visual inspection is non-negotiable—use histograms, QQ plots, and boxplots.

• Always report effect size and confidence intervals alongside p-values.

• Use multiple comparison corrections after omnibus tests.

• Permutation tests offer a powerful fallback when assumptions are shaky.

• For ordinal data (e.g., Likert scales):

  • ≥5 categories → treat as numeric or use Spearman’s correlation

  • <5 categories → stick to non-parametric

    
    

---

📌 Notes (Terminology for Clarity)

• “Two dependent means” = “paired data” = same subjects measured twice or matched units

• “> Two dependent means” = “repeated measures” = same subject measured 3+ times or matched clusters

• χ² = Chi-square test — a test of independence or goodness-of-fit

• “Parametric” = assumes normality or known distributional form

• “Non-parametric” = distribution-free, based on ranks or resampling

---

🎯 Is the Purpose of All These Tests to find the p-value?

Short answer: Not exactly.

While p-values are a byproduct of these statistical tests, they are not the main purpose, especially not in modern clinical research thinking.

Let’s clarify the deeper goals behind using statistical tests:

🧪 The True Purpose of Classical Tests (like t-test, ANOVA, χ²)

They are tools to answer this fundamental question:

"Is the observed difference (between means or proportions) likely to be due to chance?" = statistical difference

To answer that, the test:

1. Quantifies how extreme your data are under the assumption of no effect (null hypothesis)

2. Outputs a test statistic (like t, F, or χ²)

3. Converts that to a p-value, which tells you the probability of seeing a result as extreme (or more) if the null hypothesis were true
   

---

💡 But P-Value Alone Is Not Enough

Here’s what your test should give you (in this order of importance):

Element	What It Tells You
✅ Effect size (mean difference, risk ratio, etc.)	Clinical magnitude
✅ Confidence interval (CI)	Precision + range of likely true values
✅ p-value	Statistical significance (yes/no under a cutoff, usually 0.05)

🔍 Secret Insight: A small p-value tells you something is unlikely under the null, but it says nothing about the size or importance of the effect.

---

🧠 Clinical Translation

Imagine this scenario:

• Your study finds a statistically significant difference in systolic BP (p = 0.01) between two treatments.

• But the mean difference is just 1.2 mmHg, with a 95% CI of 0.4 to 2.0 mmHg.

Would you change your practice based on that?

Probably not. Because while the p-value is small, the effect is clinically trivial.

---

✅ Key Takeaways

• Statistical tests help you evaluate evidence, not just compute a p-value.

• The real goal is to quantify and interpret differences in a way that matters for patients.

• Effect size + confidence interval should always accompany the p-value.

• Relying only on p-values is like judging a book by its punctuation—you miss the whole narrative.